The genetic program: creator, demiurge, or neither? (Re: Program God)


[ Follow Ups ]


Posted by Ramellini on November 01, 1999 at 04:41:55:

I've already posted this message to contribute to the debate about the message "The Program God", but it was included in the archive april-october 1999.
Here, I present it again, to feed discussion.
Traditionally it has been made a distinction between the terms 'creator' and 'demiurge'. The creator
creates something from nothing, while the demiurge arranges, orders, sets in order something having
preexisting matter, space and ideas available. So that, your hypothesis would become, I think, that
the genetic program is a demiurge.
Now, let's look at the hypothesis. What sort of demiurge should be the genetic program? What
should it order?
Firstly, it is called 'program' a system of instructions necessary (but eventually not sufficient) to
perform an algorhytm. Biologically, the term knows a metaphorical utilization which is not always
easy to clarify; so, could you give us the meaning you use?
As far as I can see, three main definitions have been proposed for 'program':
- a system of generic information or data
- a system of instructions necessary to synthesize protids
- a system of regulation of the energy flow which crosses a living entity
If we specify that it is a 'genetic program', we restrict the field of data, instructions, regulation signals
to those related to polynucleotides (DNAs, RNAs or both; this choice should be declared).
In any case, we can show that the genetic program is not a condition necessary and sufficient to set in
order a living entity, in the sense of starting its life, through this experiment. Put in a test-tube a
bacterial growth medium, with all the substances necessary to bacterial life (or even all the organules
of a bacterial cell), and the energy necessary for the construction of a bacterial cell, in the form of
potential chemical energy. Then, put in the tube a bacterial chromosome, the material substrate of the
genetic program. You will realize that nothing happens or, better, no bacterial life takes place, while
the substances begin to decade towards the termodynamic equilibrium: the program fails the goal of
ordering the bacterial life.
On the contrary, try this experiment. Put in a test-tube a medium containing an enucleated human egg
cell. Then inject into it the nucleus of a human sperm cell. Soon you will watch the beginning of the
embryonal development. What's the difference? The fact is that in this case, in addition to the genetic
nuclear program, other necessary conditions have been satisfied, for instance the correct topological
arrangement of the substances and organules.
So that, the genetic program can be seen as a condition necessary, but not sufficient, to "explain
every (biological) observed structure in a satisfying manner".


Follow Ups: